<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gordon Brown defends his record on lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/</link>
	<description>News, reviews and comment from Europe&#039;s largest gay news service</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:55:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidW</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110635</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110635</guid>
		<description>Dennis H either you are living in a fantasy world of your own imagining, or you are an accomplished liar and Tory troll. You claim that Labour didn&#039;t effect the repeal of Clause 28. I suggest first of all that you read my post no.20 on this thread, which gives the facts - that the Tories repeatedly tried to stop repeal and that Labour forced it through.

You claim that repeal was passed only by the casting vote of the Speaker with &#039;many&#039; Labour MPs voting against; a blunt lie, on your part. The Tory leader at that time, Michael Howard, voted against repeal, with his Tory colleagues. Before him, Tory leader William Hague had enforced a three-line whip to defend the clause, after him David Cameron called repeal “deeply unpopular… a fringe agenda”.

If you want the actual numbers, look at http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2003-03-10&amp;number=109 - on 10th March 2003, 301 Labour MPs voted for repeal, 3 against (a shameful 3 too many, but not &#039;many&#039; as your lie stated. But even at that last gasp, when it was clear repeal would happen, 72 Tory MPs voted against repeal (and prior to that, it was more like 120+ Tories at each vote).

It&#039;s shameful that you come on here and post a blunt lie, and you then go on to pretend that Labour has done nothing for gay rights during their time in government. Presumably then you&#039;ve missed the following:
Labour ratified the European Convention on Human Rights, which gives us the protection of the European Court of Human Rights (which the Tories now want to end).
Labour brought in an equal age of consent, against Tory objections.
Labour recognised same-sex partnerships for immigration purposes.
Labour appointed the first openly gay Peer, had the first openly gay cabinet mininster.
Labour ended the witch-hunts of gays in the armed forces and LGBT people can now serve without fear.
Labour made it possible for gays to foster and adopt and for lesbians to access IVF treatment, and for gays to be recognised as joint parents.
Labour gave gay partners the right to succeed to a housing tenancy if their partner died, and gave gay surviving partners the right to claim damages after a fatal accident.
Under Labour, the police have started acting against homophobic crimes instead of victimising gay people, Labour brought in tougher sentences for crimes aggravated by homophobic prejudice, and Labour repeal the Sexual Offences act which was used to trap gay men.
Labour made it illegal to discriminate against gays and lesbians in the workplace.
Labour introduced Civil partnerships - not perfect in my eyes, but a damn sight more than the nothing we had before and a step towards marriage equality.
Labour&#039;s passed the first Equality Act giving the first ever protection against discrimination in buying goods &amp; services
Labour has created a requirement for government departments to treat us equally which was never there before, and has changed the tenor of government policy from the specifically anti-gay bigotry of the Tory years.

Maybe you missed all that. Maybe you want to claim that none of it matters to you. But please don&#039;t come on here with blunt lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis H either you are living in a fantasy world of your own imagining, or you are an accomplished liar and Tory troll. You claim that Labour didn&#8217;t effect the repeal of Clause 28. I suggest first of all that you read my post no.20 on this thread, which gives the facts &#8211; that the Tories repeatedly tried to stop repeal and that Labour forced it through.</p>
<p>You claim that repeal was passed only by the casting vote of the Speaker with &#8216;many&#8217; Labour MPs voting against; a blunt lie, on your part. The Tory leader at that time, Michael Howard, voted against repeal, with his Tory colleagues. Before him, Tory leader William Hague had enforced a three-line whip to defend the clause, after him David Cameron called repeal “deeply unpopular… a fringe agenda”.</p>
<p>If you want the actual numbers, look at <a href="http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2003-03-10&#038;number=109" rel="nofollow">http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2003-03-10&#038;number=109</a> &#8211; on 10th March 2003, 301 Labour MPs voted for repeal, 3 against (a shameful 3 too many, but not &#8216;many&#8217; as your lie stated. But even at that last gasp, when it was clear repeal would happen, 72 Tory MPs voted against repeal (and prior to that, it was more like 120+ Tories at each vote).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s shameful that you come on here and post a blunt lie, and you then go on to pretend that Labour has done nothing for gay rights during their time in government. Presumably then you&#8217;ve missed the following:<br />
Labour ratified the European Convention on Human Rights, which gives us the protection of the European Court of Human Rights (which the Tories now want to end).<br />
Labour brought in an equal age of consent, against Tory objections.<br />
Labour recognised same-sex partnerships for immigration purposes.<br />
Labour appointed the first openly gay Peer, had the first openly gay cabinet mininster.<br />
Labour ended the witch-hunts of gays in the armed forces and LGBT people can now serve without fear.<br />
Labour made it possible for gays to foster and adopt and for lesbians to access IVF treatment, and for gays to be recognised as joint parents.<br />
Labour gave gay partners the right to succeed to a housing tenancy if their partner died, and gave gay surviving partners the right to claim damages after a fatal accident.<br />
Under Labour, the police have started acting against homophobic crimes instead of victimising gay people, Labour brought in tougher sentences for crimes aggravated by homophobic prejudice, and Labour repeal the Sexual Offences act which was used to trap gay men.<br />
Labour made it illegal to discriminate against gays and lesbians in the workplace.<br />
Labour introduced Civil partnerships &#8211; not perfect in my eyes, but a damn sight more than the nothing we had before and a step towards marriage equality.<br />
Labour&#8217;s passed the first Equality Act giving the first ever protection against discrimination in buying goods &amp; services<br />
Labour has created a requirement for government departments to treat us equally which was never there before, and has changed the tenor of government policy from the specifically anti-gay bigotry of the Tory years.</p>
<p>Maybe you missed all that. Maybe you want to claim that none of it matters to you. But please don&#8217;t come on here with blunt lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis H</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110612</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110612</guid>
		<description>It must be fully clarified that what Gordon Brown says about doing this and taht for Gay Rights is a utter and complete &quot;MYTH&quot;--Brown as done nothing that we LGBT campaigners have for years campaigned for---HIS Party did not give us the end of Clause 28--infact that was passed by 1 vote alone--that of the speaker who excercised his right to vote---in fact many Labour MPs voted with the Tories against repeal of clause 28--

The New Labour Party as used the Pink Pound and Pink Vote (about 6%) for their own means to stay in power for so long-

again, if it was not for a few couragious LGB MPs having the bottle to come out, we would still be further behind then now in our rights-

PS i am not a Tory or LibDem voter either, so no sour grapes to Brown only

So anyone who feels New Labour as done anything for LGBT rights dare i say it, pray tell me what--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be fully clarified that what Gordon Brown says about doing this and taht for Gay Rights is a utter and complete &#8220;MYTH&#8221;&#8211;Brown as done nothing that we LGBT campaigners have for years campaigned for&#8212;HIS Party did not give us the end of Clause 28&#8211;infact that was passed by 1 vote alone&#8211;that of the speaker who excercised his right to vote&#8212;in fact many Labour MPs voted with the Tories against repeal of clause 28&#8211;</p>
<p>The New Labour Party as used the Pink Pound and Pink Vote (about 6%) for their own means to stay in power for so long-</p>
<p>again, if it was not for a few couragious LGB MPs having the bottle to come out, we would still be further behind then now in our rights-</p>
<p>PS i am not a Tory or LibDem voter either, so no sour grapes to Brown only</p>
<p>So anyone who feels New Labour as done anything for LGBT rights dare i say it, pray tell me what&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidW</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110482</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110482</guid>
		<description>I think that one class of legal marriage or civil partnership should be available to any couple, regardless of gender. I have no problem with cranky religious groups decidng that they won&#039;t conduct ceremonies for particular people, but then I don&#039;t think any marriage conducted by a religious group should have any legal status - ie, if you get married in a church/mosque/temple/synagogue/pagan ceremony, that should be for your private satisfaction but you should be required to have at least a 5-minute &quot;say the words, sign the book&quot; with a Registrar if you want your &#039;union&#039; to be legal.

It&#039;s not that I necessarily want it for myself, but I believe that we should be working towards equality. I never wanted to join the army, but I think it&#039;s a great advance in recent years that gay people can join and not risk a dishonourable discharge, and be treated the same as anyone else, just like I think the age of consent should be identical.

Civil partnerships were a great advance on nothing at all, and equality is often achieved in stages, but I think we should be looking for more steps towards equality - and the proof of the pudding over many years is that labour and LibDems vote for that, Tories vote against.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that one class of legal marriage or civil partnership should be available to any couple, regardless of gender. I have no problem with cranky religious groups decidng that they won&#8217;t conduct ceremonies for particular people, but then I don&#8217;t think any marriage conducted by a religious group should have any legal status &#8211; ie, if you get married in a church/mosque/temple/synagogue/pagan ceremony, that should be for your private satisfaction but you should be required to have at least a 5-minute &#8220;say the words, sign the book&#8221; with a Registrar if you want your &#8216;union&#8217; to be legal.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that I necessarily want it for myself, but I believe that we should be working towards equality. I never wanted to join the army, but I think it&#8217;s a great advance in recent years that gay people can join and not risk a dishonourable discharge, and be treated the same as anyone else, just like I think the age of consent should be identical.</p>
<p>Civil partnerships were a great advance on nothing at all, and equality is often achieved in stages, but I think we should be looking for more steps towards equality &#8211; and the proof of the pudding over many years is that labour and LibDems vote for that, Tories vote against.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSW8</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110473</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSW8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110473</guid>
		<description>To those who delude themselves and link voting Liberal Democrat and achieving &#039;gay marriage&#039;: Nowhere have the Liberal Democrats actually given any binding commitment to give us gay marriage. Nor is there any realistic chance that they ever would within the foreseeable future (even if by some miracle they were in a position to form a government).

All we have is a statement from Nick Clegg claiming that he personally supports it (but not so much that he is willing to taint the manifesto with that support).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those who delude themselves and link voting Liberal Democrat and achieving &#8216;gay marriage&#8217;: Nowhere have the Liberal Democrats actually given any binding commitment to give us gay marriage. Nor is there any realistic chance that they ever would within the foreseeable future (even if by some miracle they were in a position to form a government).</p>
<p>All we have is a statement from Nick Clegg claiming that he personally supports it (but not so much that he is willing to taint the manifesto with that support).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chester</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110470</link>
		<dc:creator>Chester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110470</guid>
		<description>many seek gay marriage and stonewall are out of touch with what people want!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many seek gay marriage and stonewall are out of touch with what people want!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110468</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110468</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You&#039;re a dreamer.&lt;/i&gt;

It is only through dreams that equity is achieved (and I really am far more interested in equity than I am equality).

I still say that &#039;gay marriage&#039; is a false totem and that I see no evidence that there is widespread support for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You&#8217;re a dreamer.</i></p>
<p>It is only through dreams that equity is achieved (and I really am far more interested in equity than I am equality).</p>
<p>I still say that &#8216;gay marriage&#8217; is a false totem and that I see no evidence that there is widespread support for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbet</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110460</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110460</guid>
		<description>@Mark, do you really think marriage can be disestablished? You&#039;re a dreamer. Call it marriage, call it civil partnership, call it something else. It&#039;s all the same. It&#039;s a societal and governmental recognition of relationships. The state should not make distinctions between the relationships of heterosexuals, bisexuals and homosexuals alike. If it&#039;s called marriage or something else, doesn&#039;t make one iota of difference. It should be available equally to all sexual orientations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark, do you really think marriage can be disestablished? You&#8217;re a dreamer. Call it marriage, call it civil partnership, call it something else. It&#8217;s all the same. It&#8217;s a societal and governmental recognition of relationships. The state should not make distinctions between the relationships of heterosexuals, bisexuals and homosexuals alike. If it&#8217;s called marriage or something else, doesn&#8217;t make one iota of difference. It should be available equally to all sexual orientations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110457</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110457</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Maybe you don&#039;t see us as equal. &lt;/i&gt;

Don&#039;t be ridiculous. Of course I see us as equal; but as someone who believes that marriage should be disestablished and the Civil Partnership should be accessible to all and the only form of union recognised by the state, I don&#039;t see &#039;gay marraige&#039; as a totem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Maybe you don&#8217;t see us as equal. </i></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be ridiculous. Of course I see us as equal; but as someone who believes that marriage should be disestablished and the Civil Partnership should be accessible to all and the only form of union recognised by the state, I don&#8217;t see &#8216;gay marraige&#8217; as a totem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbet</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110454</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110454</guid>
		<description>@Sam Price, Labour has never promised to us to completely eradicate homophobia. That would be the same as to promise to completely eradicate racism. It&#039;s impossible. It will never happen. This is the stuff of historical facts, not fiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sam Price, Labour has never promised to us to completely eradicate homophobia. That would be the same as to promise to completely eradicate racism. It&#8217;s impossible. It will never happen. This is the stuff of historical facts, not fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbet</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110452</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110452</guid>
		<description>@Mark, it&#039;s crystal clear to me that there should be no differences whatsoever in the treatment afforded to heterosexuals, bisexuals, homosexuals and all the sexual orientations alike. I&#039;m not &quot;imposing&quot; my thoughts on anyone, let alone the community as a whole. It appears something on my discourse is bothering you. Perhaps it&#039;s the equality issue. Maybe you don&#039;t see us as equal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark, it&#8217;s crystal clear to me that there should be no differences whatsoever in the treatment afforded to heterosexuals, bisexuals, homosexuals and all the sexual orientations alike. I&#8217;m not &#8220;imposing&#8221; my thoughts on anyone, let alone the community as a whole. It appears something on my discourse is bothering you. Perhaps it&#8217;s the equality issue. Maybe you don&#8217;t see us as equal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110447</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110447</guid>
		<description>It took many years before we got the CP, many years after lab was in power, we still have a CP and not a marriage and in the eyes of most people it&#039;s not the same in the UK or in the rest of the world. It not the same as marriage in France and it&#039;s not the same in the UK, this is discrimination and with a majority of power for so long in the UK why did Lab settle with this. In Europe, recent past, when CP had problems in Europe, as a previous comment said the govt reaction was that France was a soverign state, cons, lib dems and green all took immmediate action with the commissioner in the EU - see question asked in the last year, sorry can&#039;t fin any from lab. Suddenly there is europe wide recognition on the agenda, what&#039;s changed, ah yes,the election. When the states asked the UK to go to was against 2 soverign arab countries, there were no problems. When intervence against a court case in Austria as per comment 9</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took many years before we got the CP, many years after lab was in power, we still have a CP and not a marriage and in the eyes of most people it&#8217;s not the same in the UK or in the rest of the world. It not the same as marriage in France and it&#8217;s not the same in the UK, this is discrimination and with a majority of power for so long in the UK why did Lab settle with this. In Europe, recent past, when CP had problems in Europe, as a previous comment said the govt reaction was that France was a soverign state, cons, lib dems and green all took immmediate action with the commissioner in the EU &#8211; see question asked in the last year, sorry can&#8217;t fin any from lab. Suddenly there is europe wide recognition on the agenda, what&#8217;s changed, ah yes,the election. When the states asked the UK to go to was against 2 soverign arab countries, there were no problems. When intervence against a court case in Austria as per comment 9</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110446</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110446</guid>
		<description>Bob71350 

&lt;i&gt;….just because you don&#039;t know any gay people who don&#039;t want the right to marry, doesn&#039;t mean they don&#039;t exist. &lt;/i&gt;

Where have I said that they don&#039;t exist? Even suggesting that I have said that really shows how desperate you are. 

If there was really such strong support for it, don&#039;t you think that gay marriage would be on Stonewall&#039;s list of election demands? Maybe you should ask yourself why it isn&#039;t; because the answer is quite simple: there is no evidence that there is widespread support for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob71350 </p>
<p><i>….just because you don&#8217;t know any gay people who don&#8217;t want the right to marry, doesn&#8217;t mean they don&#8217;t exist. </i></p>
<p>Where have I said that they don&#8217;t exist? Even suggesting that I have said that really shows how desperate you are. </p>
<p>If there was really such strong support for it, don&#8217;t you think that gay marriage would be on Stonewall&#8217;s list of election demands? Maybe you should ask yourself why it isn&#8217;t; because the answer is quite simple: there is no evidence that there is widespread support for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob71350</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110443</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob71350</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110443</guid>
		<description>Dave, No. 23.   Brown and Cameron do support civil partnerships and yes, they do because it gets them off the hook supporting full civil marriage equality which neither do anyway.  If Cameron did, he would not have said he&#039;d &quot;consider&quot; it if elected.  If he truly believe in FULL equality, he would have unequivocally supported it.   There are many LGBT people in our country who want that option and freedom of choice.  

Mark No. 19....just because you don&#039;t know any gay people who don&#039;t want the right to marry, doesn&#039;t mean they don&#039;t exist.  They most certainly do and there are many of them. Not every gay man or woman in the UK posts comments on Pink News either.  By your failure to find or seek out people who do want to get married, do you then think they should not be allowed?  If NO, then you don&#039;t believe in full equality. Why do you think the number of countries allowing us to marry instead of forming different non-marital unions is slowly growing (8 already)  and surpassing the UK, France, Germany, and a few others in the EU?  We&#039;re outnumbered and that&#039;s going to continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, No. 23.   Brown and Cameron do support civil partnerships and yes, they do because it gets them off the hook supporting full civil marriage equality which neither do anyway.  If Cameron did, he would not have said he&#8217;d &#8220;consider&#8221; it if elected.  If he truly believe in FULL equality, he would have unequivocally supported it.   There are many LGBT people in our country who want that option and freedom of choice.  </p>
<p>Mark No. 19&#8230;.just because you don&#8217;t know any gay people who don&#8217;t want the right to marry, doesn&#8217;t mean they don&#8217;t exist.  They most certainly do and there are many of them. Not every gay man or woman in the UK posts comments on Pink News either.  By your failure to find or seek out people who do want to get married, do you then think they should not be allowed?  If NO, then you don&#8217;t believe in full equality. Why do you think the number of countries allowing us to marry instead of forming different non-marital unions is slowly growing (8 already)  and surpassing the UK, France, Germany, and a few others in the EU?  We&#8217;re outnumbered and that&#8217;s going to continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Price</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110442</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110442</guid>
		<description>Very scary stuff indeed Bobbet but if we have a very nasty homophobic majority in our society already then doesn&#039;t that suggest that Labour have failed. Just waiting to surface too, where they been? This surely is the stuff of novels coz I don&#039;t see it. 

Lib Dems rule! (well no yet - they rock though)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very scary stuff indeed Bobbet but if we have a very nasty homophobic majority in our society already then doesn&#8217;t that suggest that Labour have failed. Just waiting to surface too, where they been? This surely is the stuff of novels coz I don&#8217;t see it. </p>
<p>Lib Dems rule! (well no yet &#8211; they rock though)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110441</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110441</guid>
		<description>Bobbet 

&lt;i&gt;It doesn&#039;t matter how many or what individual gay persons think about gay marriage. What is important here is the issue of equal rights and fairness. The majority of gay persons think this way. They don&#039;t want to be treated as second class citizens. &lt;/i&gt;

I really think you should stop imposing your own thoughts on the community as a whole. The simply fact remains that most of the community here in the UK doesn&#039;t even view gay marriage as an equality issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobbet </p>
<p><i>It doesn&#8217;t matter how many or what individual gay persons think about gay marriage. What is important here is the issue of equal rights and fairness. The majority of gay persons think this way. They don&#8217;t want to be treated as second class citizens. </i></p>
<p>I really think you should stop imposing your own thoughts on the community as a whole. The simply fact remains that most of the community here in the UK doesn&#8217;t even view gay marriage as an equality issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbet</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110438</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110438</guid>
		<description>You all can be assured, under a new Tory government, we will see an increase of homophobic rhetoric to justify all kinds of prejudice and discrimination against us. Our rights can be eroded little by little. Their core homophobic supporters will implement their norms, and their homophobic thinking has already found its way into their political discourse, with the patent tolerance from the very top of their party. There&#039;s a very fine line between patent tolerance, tacit approval and the promotion of bigotry. You should take nothing for granted. We can still see our latest 13 years of progress roll back little by little. And it can take another one or two generations for us to correct any damage done by them. History shows it&#039;s more than likely it can happen exactly like this, since there&#039;s a very nasty homophobic majority in our society just waiting to surface again, as was the case in any of the decades before, when sexual freedoms were rolled back. It happened before, and it can still happen now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You all can be assured, under a new Tory government, we will see an increase of homophobic rhetoric to justify all kinds of prejudice and discrimination against us. Our rights can be eroded little by little. Their core homophobic supporters will implement their norms, and their homophobic thinking has already found its way into their political discourse, with the patent tolerance from the very top of their party. There&#8217;s a very fine line between patent tolerance, tacit approval and the promotion of bigotry. You should take nothing for granted. We can still see our latest 13 years of progress roll back little by little. And it can take another one or two generations for us to correct any damage done by them. History shows it&#8217;s more than likely it can happen exactly like this, since there&#8217;s a very nasty homophobic majority in our society just waiting to surface again, as was the case in any of the decades before, when sexual freedoms were rolled back. It happened before, and it can still happen now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Price</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110437</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110437</guid>
		<description>Am I the only gay person who has never felt like a second class citizen. Then maybe I&#039;ve got everything I need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only gay person who has never felt like a second class citizen. Then maybe I&#8217;ve got everything I need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbet</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110432</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110432</guid>
		<description>@Mark
It doesn&#039;t matter how many or what individual gay persons think about gay marriage. What is important here is the issue of equal rights and fairness. The majority of gay persons think this way. They don&#039;t want to be treated as second class citizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark<br />
It doesn&#8217;t matter how many or what individual gay persons think about gay marriage. What is important here is the issue of equal rights and fairness. The majority of gay persons think this way. They don&#8217;t want to be treated as second class citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSW8</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110414</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSW8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110414</guid>
		<description>Gendy, 

According to Stonewall&#039;s voting records, Gordon Brown is within a smidgeon of being as supportive of LGBT issues as Nick Clegg is (despite having far more commitments outside of the country and parliament which would prevent him for turning up for many votes) and exactly the same as Vince Cable&#039;s. It is as near as damn it the same as Simon Hughes&#039; record, which even Peter Tatchell is at pains to tell us is exemplary.

In fact, there are numerous Liberal Democrat MPs who have far worse records than Gordon Brown does on supporting LGBT issues.

Your lame attempts to portray Gordon Brown as some sort of a homophobic bigot really don&#039;t wash.   

http://www.stonewall.org.uk/documents/stonewall_mp_voting_records_2010_1.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gendy, </p>
<p>According to Stonewall&#8217;s voting records, Gordon Brown is within a smidgeon of being as supportive of LGBT issues as Nick Clegg is (despite having far more commitments outside of the country and parliament which would prevent him for turning up for many votes) and exactly the same as Vince Cable&#8217;s. It is as near as damn it the same as Simon Hughes&#8217; record, which even Peter Tatchell is at pains to tell us is exemplary.</p>
<p>In fact, there are numerous Liberal Democrat MPs who have far worse records than Gordon Brown does on supporting LGBT issues.</p>
<p>Your lame attempts to portray Gordon Brown as some sort of a homophobic bigot really don&#8217;t wash.   </p>
<p><a href="http://www.stonewall.org.uk/documents/stonewall_mp_voting_records_2010_1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.stonewall.org.uk/documents/stonewall_mp_voting_records_2010_1.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110400</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/04/23/gordon-brown-defends-his-record-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-trans-rights/#comment-110400</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;No, it simply presupposes that people want to be treated as having equal rights. Most straight people don&#039;t want to get married, but that doesn&#039;t mean they would be content to have less rights than gay people. &lt;/i&gt;

Sorry Dave, but that is the most tortured logic I have seen in many a year. The statement &lt;i&gt;&quot;If not then there is no reason why any LGBT person should vote for Labour&quot;&lt;/i&gt; assumes that the LGBT community as a whole wants gay marriage and consider that it is an important factor in considering how to vote .. but there are no hard facts to suggest that most members of the LGBT community in the UK even think that gay marriage is an important totem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>No, it simply presupposes that people want to be treated as having equal rights. Most straight people don&#8217;t want to get married, but that doesn&#8217;t mean they would be content to have less rights than gay people. </i></p>
<p>Sorry Dave, but that is the most tortured logic I have seen in many a year. The statement <i>&#8220;If not then there is no reason why any LGBT person should vote for Labour&#8221;</i> assumes that the LGBT community as a whole wants gay marriage and consider that it is an important factor in considering how to vote .. but there are no hard facts to suggest that most members of the LGBT community in the UK even think that gay marriage is an important totem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 1971/1972 objects using apc

Served from: www.thegaynews.co.uk @ 2012-02-09 11:56:22 -->
